<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 12 vs. OpenOffice.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2005/office-12-vs-openofficeorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2005/office-12-vs-openofficeorg/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2005/office-12-vs-openofficeorg/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/?p=19#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Update!

We installed and have been successfully testing Office 12 Official Beta 1 for two weeks now. 
Its much faster nd more stable, but besides that not very different. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update!</p>
<p>We installed and have been successfully testing Office 12 Official Beta 1 for two weeks now.<br />
Its much faster nd more stable, but besides that not very different. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 265/266 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: acf.neosmart.net

Served from: neosmart.net @ 2012-05-24 22:36:05 -->
