<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Separate .NET 3.0 and What it Means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is .NET Taking Over the World? at The NeoSmart Files</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-7262</link>
		<dc:creator>Is .NET Taking Over the World? at The NeoSmart Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-7262</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 short years ago, Microsoft unveiled its new framework/engine for programming and running applications in a virtual environment, and the world was stunned. Microsoft had introduced a run-time environment that was for the first time a true &#8220;Write once, run everywhere&#8221; implementation, but that was far from being the end. With .NET 3.0 on the loom, NeoSmart Technologies takes a look at how far .NET has come and just how long it can keep going. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 short years ago, Microsoft unveiled its new framework/engine for programming and running applications in a virtual environment, and the world was stunned. Microsoft had introduced a run-time environment that was for the first time a true &ldquo;Write once, run everywhere&rdquo; implementation, but that was far from being the end. With .NET 3.0 on the loom, NeoSmart Technologies takes a look at how far .NET has come and just how long it can keep going. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World of Firebird &#38; Delphi: August 2006</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>World of Firebird &#38; Delphi: August 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] A Separate .NET 3.0 and What it Means    Ricky Tan of Microsoft’s MSDN Blogs hints at an RTM within two months for the new .NET Framework 3.0, and leaves us to wonder just what that means for the .NET Developers out there. For those of you that haven’t heard, Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework is the new name for WinFX and .NET 2.0 bundled together.Read more [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] A Separate .NET 3.0 and What it Means    Ricky Tan of Microsoft’s MSDN Blogs hints at an RTM within two months for the new .NET Framework 3.0, and leaves us to wonder just what that means for the .NET Developers out there. For those of you that haven’t heard, Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework is the new name for WinFX and .NET 2.0 bundled together.Read more [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C ph&#7843;i .NET s&#7869; lm ch&#7911; th&#7871; gi&#7899;i - C&#803;ng &#273;&#768;ng C Vi&#803;t</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator>C ph&#7843;i .NET s&#7869; lm ch&#7911; th&#7871; gi&#7899;i - C&#803;ng &#273;&#768;ng C Vi&#803;t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3739</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] C ph&#7843;i .NET s&#7869; lm ch&#7911; th&#7871; gi&#7899;i     Cch &#273;y 4 n&#259;m, Microsoft tung ra m&#7897;t framework m&#7899;i &#273;&#7875; l&#7853;p trnh v ch&#7841;y cc &#7913;ng d&#7909;ng trong mi tr&#432;&#7901;ng &#7843;o, v th&#7871; gi&#7899;i chong vng v &#273;i&#7873;u ny. Microsoft &#273;&#432;a ra mi tr&#432;&#7901;ng g&#7885;i l &quot;vi&#7871;t m&#7897;t l&#7847;n, ch&#7841;y m&#7885;i n&#417;i&quot;. V&#7899;i .NET 3.0 on loom, NeoSmart Technologies &#273;&#432;a ra ci nhn v&#7873; vi&#7879;c .NET s&#7869; pht tri&#7875;n &#273;&#7871;n &#273;u v n s&#7869; &#273;i bao xa  Xem chi ti&#7871;t [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3704</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3704</guid>
		<description>The whole point is that APIs break, but the .NET Framework never has and never will. It&#039;s an entire layer of future-proof coding protection.

And, just for the record, .NET isn&#039;t an API the same way an SDK is - that&#039;s just a DLL and puts the maintenance on the shoulders of the developers, but .NET takes that burden instead with Microsoft guaranteeing complete compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point is that APIs break, but the .NET Framework never has and never will. It&#8217;s an entire layer of future-proof coding protection.</p>
<p>And, just for the record, .NET isn&#8217;t an API the same way an SDK is &#8211; that&#8217;s just a DLL and puts the maintenance on the shoulders of the developers, but .NET takes that burden instead with Microsoft guaranteeing complete compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McLaws</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3696</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McLaws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3696</guid>
		<description>Um, I hate to tell you this, but your whole &quot;Developer Speak&quot; section is incorrect. .NET *is* a bunch of APIs. All the other stuff you try to explain is just confusing and takes away from the point you&#039;re trying to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I hate to tell you this, but your whole &#8220;Developer Speak&#8221; section is incorrect. .NET *is* a bunch of APIs. All the other stuff you try to explain is just confusing and takes away from the point you&#8217;re trying to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ÎÜñ&#124;‹ø//ñ [ÐëÞrëçã†ëð]'s Blog : .NET 3.0 RTM?</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3649</link>
		<dc:creator>ÎÜñ&#124;‹ø//ñ [ÐëÞrëçã†ëð]'s Blog : .NET 3.0 RTM?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3649</guid>
		<description>[...] NeoSmart highlights about the fact that there is a possibility that .NET 3.0 might RTM in a couple of months. What would this mean? Well a couple of things. One, hopefully MS has gotten their act together and stop making huge breaking changes in every public drop. While I understand that every CTP is still early in beta and with the nature of these things there will be changes, but you should see the number of breaking changes that are being made so late in the game. And the changes are not small, but&#160;classes, methods, parameters,&#160;etc. being changed, moved, renamed, etc. Which makes all this quite irritating &#8211; and it seems quite similar to experiences shared with a few other colleagues of mine had with VSTS and Team Foundation Server. And two, hopefully there would be documentation! Currently, one of the chapters for the WCF book I am writing is on Peer-2&#8211;Peer networking and there is almost no information publicly available! Which as you can imagine makes life a bit interesting, though reflector is your friend in such situations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NeoSmart highlights about the fact that there is a possibility that .NET 3.0 might RTM in a couple of months. What would this mean? Well a couple of things. One, hopefully MS has gotten their act together and stop making huge breaking changes in every public drop. While I understand that every CTP is still early in beta and with the nature of these things there will be changes, but you should see the number of breaking changes that are being made so late in the game. And the changes are not small, but&nbsp;classes, methods, parameters,&nbsp;etc. being changed, moved, renamed, etc. Which makes all this quite irritating &ndash; and it seems quite similar to experiences shared with a few other colleagues of mine had with VSTS and Team Foundation Server. And two, hopefully there would be documentation! Currently, one of the chapters for the WCF book I am writing is on Peer-2&ndash;Peer networking and there is almost no information publicly available! Which as you can imagine makes life a bit interesting, though reflector is your friend in such situations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exploits , vulnerabilities , articles , .NET 3.0's Separate RTM and What It Means</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3639</link>
		<dc:creator>exploits , vulnerabilities , articles , .NET 3.0's Separate RTM and What It Means</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3639</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] NeoSmart Technologies reports on what the upcoming RTM of the Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework means, both for developers and those seeking a look at what&#039;s coming from Microsoft&#039;s direction. It includes the positive implications this has on Microsoft&#039;s laggy development process and the benefits it&#039;ll provide to developers and system programmers too.              News - newest 10 RSS &#124; More [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] NeoSmart Technologies reports on what the upcoming RTM of the Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework means, both for developers and those seeking a look at what&#8217;s coming from Microsoft&#8217;s direction. It includes the positive implications this has on Microsoft&#8217;s laggy development process and the benefits it&#8217;ll provide to developers and system programmers too.              News &#8211; newest 10 RSS | More [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .NET 3.0's Separate RTM and What It Means - OSNews.com</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-separate-net-30-and-what-it-means/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>.NET 3.0's Separate RTM and What It Means - OSNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/233#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Register &#124; FAQ Forgot password?         &#160; .NET 3.0&#039;s Separate RTM and What It Means &#160; Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on 2006-08-06 02:54:05 UTC, submitted by Calli Barnes NeoSmart Technologies reports on what the upcoming RTM of the Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework means, both for developers and those seeking a look at what&#039;s coming from Microsoft&#039;s direction. It includes the positive implications this has on Microsoft&#039;s laggy development process and the benefits it&#039;ll provide to developers and system programmers too.   Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_wrd=&#039;[KeyWord]&#039;;    &#160;This story has been recommended 0 times.Recommend This Story!  8 commentsPrinter friendly     Understanding Strings and Regular Expressions in C++, C# - Posted on 2006-07-30  Microsoft: .Net Beat Java, Who&#039;s Next? - Posted on 2006-07-28  Microsoft Ships Python on .Net - Posted on 2006-07-27  A First Look at IronPython: Where Python Meets .NET - Posted on 2006-07-15  Open Source Versus .Net Stacks - Posted on 2006-07-10 &#160;  More related articles [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Register | FAQ Forgot password?         &nbsp; .NET 3.0&#8217;s Separate RTM and What It Means &nbsp; Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on 2006-08-06 02:54:05 UTC, submitted by Calli Barnes NeoSmart Technologies reports on what the upcoming RTM of the Microsoft .NET 3.0 Framework means, both for developers and those seeking a look at what&#8217;s coming from Microsoft&#8217;s direction. It includes the positive implications this has on Microsoft&#8217;s laggy development process and the benefits it&#8217;ll provide to developers and system programmers too.   Ads_kid=0;Ads_bid=0;Ads_xl=0;Ads_yl=0;Ads_wrd=&#8217;[KeyWord]&#8216;;    &nbsp;This story has been recommended 0 times.Recommend This Story!  8 commentsPrinter friendly     Understanding Strings and Regular Expressions in C++, C# &#8211; Posted on 2006-07-30  Microsoft: .Net Beat Java, Who&#8217;s Next? &#8211; Posted on 2006-07-28  Microsoft Ships Python on .Net &#8211; Posted on 2006-07-27  A First Look at IronPython: Where Python Meets .NET &#8211; Posted on 2006-07-15  Open Source Versus .Net Stacks &#8211; Posted on 2006-07-10 &nbsp;  More related articles [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
