<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And We Thought Java was the Same Everywhere!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-453802</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/225#comment-453802</guid>
		<description>Ooops, funny prediction about predicting Java&#039;s decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, funny prediction about predicting Java&#8217;s decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/225#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis de Bernardy</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis de Bernardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/225#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>write once... test everywhere... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>write once&#8230; test everywhere&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud Al-Qudsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/225#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>Nope - not in a million years.

Can&#039;t remember the source, but the top online language was PHP, and offline is C  .
Java has been on the decline in terms of true usage for years, and is usually used only certain Windows open source projects, while most other OSS software is in C, and the great majority of all commercial/business applications are in C  .

Look at the facts: the official libraries for the big stuff (Windows API, Wine, DirectX, OpenAL, network stacks, basically anything that you would use to code) is in C  .

At best, Java is used to create proprietary solutions to framework-less applications &#8212; for instance if you want to use existing programs/command-line scripts and a GUI to it, or anywhere where you aren&#039;t technically coding the &lt;em&gt;libraries&lt;/em&gt; themselves in Java, it&#039;s an OK language and the easiest (well.. now that there is J# and C# that&#039;s debatable) to use - but if you have to write/use libraries directly, it&#039;ll result in more work.

The most important thing to look at on that &#039;index&#039; is the source of the info: namely, the &#039;professionals&#039; in those fields. That&#039;s a very biased look at the languages, Java is required learning material for any college or university, and it&#039;s easier than the other language: C. Java is everyone&#039;s strong language, but that doesn&#039;t make it the language of applications today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope &#8211; not in a million years.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t remember the source, but the top online language was PHP, and offline is C  .<br />
Java has been on the decline in terms of true usage for years, and is usually used only certain Windows open source projects, while most other OSS software is in C, and the great majority of all commercial/business applications are in C  .</p>
<p>Look at the facts: the official libraries for the big stuff (Windows API, Wine, DirectX, OpenAL, network stacks, basically anything that you would use to code) is in C  .</p>
<p>At best, Java is used to create proprietary solutions to framework-less applications &mdash; for instance if you want to use existing programs/command-line scripts and a GUI to it, or anywhere where you aren&#8217;t technically coding the <em>libraries</em> themselves in Java, it&#8217;s an OK language and the easiest (well.. now that there is J# and C# that&#8217;s debatable) to use &#8211; but if you have to write/use libraries directly, it&#8217;ll result in more work.</p>
<p>The most important thing to look at on that &#8216;index&#8217; is the source of the info: namely, the &#8216;professionals&#8217; in those fields. That&#8217;s a very biased look at the languages, Java is required learning material for any college or university, and it&#8217;s easier than the other language: C. Java is everyone&#8217;s strong language, but that doesn&#8217;t make it the language of applications today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/and-we-thought-java-was-the-same-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/225#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>Btw is Java really the top programming language as per http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw is Java really the top programming language as per <a href="http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index" rel="nofollow">http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 313/316 objects using xcache

Served from: neosmart.net @ 2012-02-09 19:05:25 -->
