<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0 Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Using Firefox &#124; Spread Firefox</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-11533</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Firefox &#124; Spread Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-11533</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] read a number of reviews comparing Firefox 2 and IE7&#039;s RSS capabilities. Every time Firefox comes up short. There&#039;s a reason for this though, and it relates to the Firefox philosophy of having enough [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] read a number of reviews comparing Firefox 2 and IE7&#8217;s RSS capabilities. Every time Firefox comes up short. There&#8217;s a reason for this though, and it relates to the Firefox philosophy of having enough [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeks-for-geeks: Firefox сбился с пути?</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-11529</link>
		<dc:creator>geeks-for-geeks: Firefox сбился с пути?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-11529</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] NeoSmart Technologies представила на суд общественности свою точку зрения на Firefox 2.0, уделив особое внимание недостаткам этого браузера. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] NeoSmart Technologies представила на суд общественности свою точку зрения на Firefox 2.0, уделив особое внимание недостаткам этого браузера. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browsers - Adam L on Blue Dot</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-9750</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsers - Adam L on Blue Dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-9750</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Google is a bit shameless.Doing the same kind of download they do for FF for IE7, you download a &quot;Google Optimized&quot; version of IE7, meaning it installs with their Toolbar, their personalized homepage as the homepage, and of course with Google being the default search.A nice way to highjack a browser.Kudos Google.Dot This!1 Comment (Show)PermalinkFirefox 2.0 Recap at The NeoSmart FilesATL &#124; Shared With: Everyone - 18 days ago &#124; browsers Dot This!Add CommentPermalinkNetscape Browser MainATL &#124; Shared With: Everyone - Nov 14 2006 &#124; browsers, technology [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Google is a bit shameless.Doing the same kind of download they do for FF for IE7, you download a &#8220;Google Optimized&#8221; version of IE7, meaning it installs with their Toolbar, their personalized homepage as the homepage, and of course with Google being the default search.A nice way to highjack a browser.Kudos Google.Dot This!1 Comment (Show)PermalinkFirefox 2.0 Recap at The NeoSmart FilesATL | Shared With: Everyone &#8211; 18 days ago | browsers Dot This!Add CommentPermalinkNetscape Browser MainATL | Shared With: Everyone &#8211; Nov 14 2006 | browsers, technology [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Crap: Monday, November 27, 2006</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-9696</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Crap: Monday, November 27, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-9696</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] The Open Source geeks are not very happy with the direction Firefox is headed. &#160; [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] The Open Source geeks are not very happy with the direction Firefox is headed. &nbsp; [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squatjuice :: View topic - Firefox 2.0</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8829</link>
		<dc:creator>squatjuice :: View topic - Firefox 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8829</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] mmm... dunno. Hate to throw a spanner in the works but I&#039;ve been reading in other forums that they&#039;ve been a few security flaws with version 2.   http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360493   But this doesn&#039;t mean switch to IE, no way.  http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/11/report_firefox_20_trumps_ie7_i.html   For the time being I&#039;m sticking with 1.5._________________Cough, splutter, spit!!!! [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] mmm&#8230; dunno. Hate to throw a spanner in the works but I&#8217;ve been reading in other forums that they&#8217;ve been a few security flaws with version 2.   <a href="http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294" rel="nofollow">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294</a>   <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360493" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360493</a>   But this doesn&#8217;t mean switch to IE, no way.  <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/11/report_firefox_20_trumps_ie7_i.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/11/report_firefox_20_trumps_ie7_i.html</a>   For the time being I&#8217;m sticking with 1.5._________________Cough, splutter, spit!!!! [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 2.0 Recap by Make money on computer</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8807</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 2.0 Recap by Make money on computer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8807</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Firefox 2.0 Recap  by Make money on computer (make-money-on-computer) @ Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:01:14 -0500   Basically, these changes go against everything that the Firefox team has been doing for the past couple of years, and make it look like Firefox wasn’t run by an open-source community so much as a big corporation with nothing but money... Survey Jobs adult AllMale sex Credit Repair Wholesale sex Transsexual Spyware Home Job   Original post: Firefox 2.0 Recap by at Google Blog Search: make money on computer [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Firefox 2.0 Recap  by Make money on computer (make-money-on-computer) @ Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:01:14 -0500   Basically, these changes go against everything that the Firefox team has been doing for the past couple of years, and make it look like Firefox wasn’t run by an open-source community so much as a big corporation with nothing but money&#8230; Survey Jobs adult AllMale sex Credit Repair Wholesale sex Transsexual Spyware Home Job   Original post: Firefox 2.0 Recap by at Google Blog Search: make money on computer [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millennium &#124; ten &#124; Firefox 2 RSS</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>millennium &#124; ten &#124; Firefox 2 RSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I&#039;ve read a number of reviews comparing Firefox 2 and IE7&#039;s RSS capabilities. Every time Firefox comes up short. There&#039;s a reason for this though, and it relates to the Firefox philosophy of having enough features, not too many or too few. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I&#8217;ve read a number of reviews comparing Firefox 2 and IE7&#8217;s RSS capabilities. Every time Firefox comes up short. There&#8217;s a reason for this though, and it relates to the Firefox philosophy of having enough features, not too many or too few. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adblock EasyList/EasyElement, PC Support forum :: View topic - Firefox has lost its way?</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Adblock EasyList/EasyElement, PC Support forum :: View topic - Firefox has lost its way?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I read from /. a Firefox 2 review that says the phoenix is sick or pass its peak.   I feel the same even before I read the post, though I&#039;d rather believe it&#039;s only a temporary issue.   http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294   What do you think? [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I read from /. a Firefox 2 review that says the phoenix is sick or pass its peak.   I feel the same even before I read the post, though I&#8217;d rather believe it&#8217;s only a temporary issue.   <a href="http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294" rel="nofollow">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294</a>   What do you think? [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithadriel</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithadriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>I really like the new Firefox, the theme is straightforward and simple. A browser is NOT about how good it looks, it is about productivity, what can you DO with the browser. IE7 fails for the simple reason that so much clutter and graphical &quot;niceties&quot; drag your attention from the important stuff - the content.

Welcome page? Please. You look at it once, stop whining. Incidentally, I didn&#039;t see any &quot;green&quot; colouring as a result of that blending, are you still thinking your drawing with paint on a canvas?&#160;

The other browsers have their merits, but please, if your going to write a summary about a browser concentrate on points which actually have importance. Not random stuff to pad out your article to more than one page.&#160;


  &#160;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the new Firefox, the theme is straightforward and simple. A browser is NOT about how good it looks, it is about productivity, what can you DO with the browser. IE7 fails for the simple reason that so much clutter and graphical &#8220;niceties&#8221; drag your attention from the important stuff &#8211; the content.</p>
<p>Welcome page? Please. You look at it once, stop whining. Incidentally, I didn&#8217;t see any &#8220;green&#8221; colouring as a result of that blending, are you still thinking your drawing with paint on a canvas?&nbsp;</p>
<p>The other browsers have their merits, but please, if your going to write a summary about a browser concentrate on points which actually have importance. Not random stuff to pad out your article to more than one page.&nbsp;</p>
<p>  &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matth</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8200</link>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8200</guid>
		<description>I like the new Firefox toolbar icons and the first run page.&#160; The 80&#039;s are coming back in weird ways it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new Firefox toolbar icons and the first run page.&nbsp; The 80&#8217;s are coming back in weird ways it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Scoopy's Fun House</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8196</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Scoopy's Fun House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8196</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] The Open Source geeks are not very happy with the direction Firefox is headed. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] The Open Source geeks are not very happy with the direction Firefox is headed. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not so firefoxy! &#171; web pruned by dawdling monkeys</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8194</link>
		<dc:creator>Not so firefoxy! &#171; web pruned by dawdling monkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8194</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am myself an avid user of Mozilla Firefox. But my excitement is almost drained off with latest Firefox 2.0 release. I would agree to an extent with this Review There was a time when I was all into &#8220;Opera&#8220;; but gotta accept that baby is too much memory intensive; and would often make my lappy-processor cry for extreme cooling! So eventually I shifted to Firefox. I found absolutely no reason to complain, until faced few issues myself. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am myself an avid user of Mozilla Firefox. But my excitement is almost drained off with latest Firefox 2.0 release. I would agree to an extent with this Review There was a time when I was all into &#8220;Opera&#8220;; but gotta accept that baby is too much memory intensive; and would often make my lappy-processor cry for extreme cooling! So eventually I shifted to Firefox. I found absolutely no reason to complain, until faced few issues myself. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not so firefoxy! &#171; web pruned by dawdling monkeys</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8193</link>
		<dc:creator>Not so firefoxy! &#171; web pruned by dawdling monkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8193</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am myself an avid user of Mozilla Firefox. But my excitement is almost drained off with latest Firefox 2.0 release. I would agree to an extent with this Review There was a time when I was all into &#8220;Opera&#8220;; but gotta accept that baby is too much memory intensive; and would often make my lappy-processor cry for extreme cooling! So eventually I shifted to Firefox. I found absolutely no reason to complain, until faced few issues myself. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am myself an avid user of Mozilla Firefox. But my excitement is almost drained off with latest Firefox 2.0 release. I would agree to an extent with this Review There was a time when I was all into &#8220;Opera&#8220;; but gotta accept that baby is too much memory intensive; and would often make my lappy-processor cry for extreme cooling! So eventually I shifted to Firefox. I found absolutely no reason to complain, until faced few issues myself. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanity Check Musec, Inc. :: View topic - Some rumblings 'bout Firefox 2.0</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8191</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanity Check Musec, Inc. :: View topic - Some rumblings 'bout Firefox 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8191</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294   I haven&#039;t upgraded to Firefox 2.0 yet. I&#039;m still using 1.5.0.8.   I&#039;m not sure I would agree with some of these complaints (my posting of links should never imply agreement anyway)... it&#039;s difficult to tell without trying out version 2.0, but I&#039;ve heard some rumblings about the new version... this is just the first article I&#039;ve read._________________.  .  .  .  .  I am the Booze Monkey  often Drunk and always funky  .  BLUE&#039;s Laptop Account  =================== [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] <a href="http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294" rel="nofollow">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294</a>   I haven&#8217;t upgraded to Firefox 2.0 yet. I&#8217;m still using 1.5.0.8.   I&#8217;m not sure I would agree with some of these complaints (my posting of links should never imply agreement anyway)&#8230; it&#8217;s difficult to tell without trying out version 2.0, but I&#8217;ve heard some rumblings about the new version&#8230; this is just the first article I&#8217;ve read._________________.  .  .  .  .  I am the Booze Monkey  often Drunk and always funky  .  BLUE&#8217;s Laptop Account  =================== [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoOkMaRk&#124;好东西 &#187; links for 2006-11-28</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/firefox-20-recap/#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>BoOkMaRk&#124;好东西 &#187; links for 2006-11-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/archives/294#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 2.0 Recap at The NeoSmart Files Basically, these changes go against everything that the Firefox team has been doing for the past couple of years, and make it look like Firefox wasn’t run by an open-source community so much as a big corporation with nothing but money on its mind. (tags: firefox) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 2.0 Recap at The NeoSmart Files Basically, these changes go against everything that the Firefox team has been doing for the past couple of years, and make it look like Firefox wasn’t run by an open-source community so much as a big corporation with nothing but money on its mind. (tags: firefox) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
