<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask: The Algorithm Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-603495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-603495</guid>
		<description>Ask toolbar sucks and once it is downloaded it is hell to get rid of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask toolbar sucks and once it is downloaded it is hell to get rid of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepe</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-544125</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-544125</guid>
		<description>I cannot find nothing in Ask.com search... And they use aggressive inflitration in your computer installing as a default wrobser withouth asking permission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot find nothing in Ask.com search&#8230; And they use aggressive inflitration in your computer installing as a default wrobser withouth asking permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-454178</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-454178</guid>
		<description>ask sucks big time.  they never answere my direct question.  I don&#039;t think they know the difference between thier ass and face</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ask sucks big time.  they never answere my direct question.  I don&#8217;t think they know the difference between thier ass and face</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-449339</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-449339</guid>
		<description>I can totally agree with this post. Ask has to be the worst search service in the history of the internet. I, like a previous poster, had trouble getting a web site redesign re-indexed by Ask. Google, Yahoo, and bing picked it up in a few days, Ask it took almost a year before they finally picked it up.

That Ask toolbar also sucks, that alone is enough to steer me away from them.

Good post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can totally agree with this post. Ask has to be the worst search service in the history of the internet. I, like a previous poster, had trouble getting a web site redesign re-indexed by Ask. Google, Yahoo, and bing picked it up in a few days, Ask it took almost a year before they finally picked it up.</p>
<p>That Ask toolbar also sucks, that alone is enough to steer me away from them.</p>
<p>Good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-446665</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-446665</guid>
		<description>I have an intense hatred for ask. Many applications come prepackaged with the ask toolbar, and its very easy to accidentally install the toolbar, especially if you&#039;re used to cliking next,next,next when install reputable software.

Even if ask created an algorithm better than google&#039;s I&#039;d still use google because the company is run by profit whores that don&#039;t care about the user. So I won&#039;t give a * about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an intense hatred for ask. Many applications come prepackaged with the ask toolbar, and its very easy to accidentally install the toolbar, especially if you&#8217;re used to cliking next,next,next when install reputable software.</p>
<p>Even if ask created an algorithm better than google&#8217;s I&#8217;d still use google because the company is run by profit whores that don&#8217;t care about the user. So I won&#8217;t give a * about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch g</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-428511</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-428511</guid>
		<description>Ask.com is still hijacking the default search engine from people&#039;s browsers.  If it was a quality peice of software, they wouldn&#039;t have to do that.  Ask seems intent on STEALING market share by duping naive users.

Here&#039;s some info to get rid of it:
Internet Explorer 6 (presumably 7 too)
1.Go to Control Panel in Windows itself
2.Click on Internet Properties
3.Click on General
4.Click on Search settings
5.Set new default and delete ask.com

Here is a link from ask itself, giving a removal tool:
Link to the executable file:
http://media.ask.com/media/toolbar/tools/AskSearchUtility.exe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com is still hijacking the default search engine from people&#8217;s browsers.  If it was a quality peice of software, they wouldn&#8217;t have to do that.  Ask seems intent on STEALING market share by duping naive users.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some info to get rid of it:<br />
Internet Explorer 6 (presumably 7 too)<br />
1.Go to Control Panel in Windows itself<br />
2.Click on Internet Properties<br />
3.Click on General<br />
4.Click on Search settings<br />
5.Set new default and delete ask.com</p>
<p>Here is a link from ask itself, giving a removal tool:<br />
Link to the executable file:<br />
<a href="http://media.ask.com/media/toolbar/tools/AskSearchUtility.exe" rel="nofollow">http://media.ask.com/media/toolbar/tools/AskSearchUtility.exe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-394726</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-394726</guid>
		<description>ASK.COM IS THE WORST!!!! I HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO FIND ANYTHING ON IT.  they somehow hijacked my internet explorer seach function from the default google seach and life has sucked ever since!!!!  i finally figured out how to change it back and will NEVER use ASK.COM AGAIN!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASK.COM IS THE WORST!!!! I HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO FIND ANYTHING ON IT.  they somehow hijacked my internet explorer seach function from the default google seach and life has sucked ever since!!!!  i finally figured out how to change it back and will NEVER use ASK.COM AGAIN!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve grindley</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-349934</link>
		<dc:creator>steve grindley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-349934</guid>
		<description>although i am a ask.com lover i find it funny that they didnt spot this page and indexed it #1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although i am a ask.com lover i find it funny that they didnt spot this page and indexed it #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-79627</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-79627</guid>
		<description>Ask.com sucks, when you download there tool bar It redirects you every fucking time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com sucks, when you download there tool bar It redirects you every fucking time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JE</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-45982</link>
		<dc:creator>JE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-45982</guid>
		<description>I have a gripe with Ask concerning my company&#039;s site (I never use the search engine personally).&#160; Last year we redesigned our website, a complete overhaul.&#160; Our site (lemonlaw.com) ranked #1 on Google, MSN and #2 on Yahoo for many terms we optimized for, but this example specifically sticks to the term &quot;lemon law&quot;.&#160; After the redesign, our rankings got even better overall.&#160; On Ask however, our site disappeared completely.&#160; Owning the domain &quot;lemonlaw.com&quot; alone should get us somewhere, but we don&#039;t even show up on ask&#039;s results for that term.&#160; How can that be?&#160; It makes absolutely no sense.&#160; All of the other terms, for example - specific state lemon laws, such &quot;pa lemon law&quot; and &quot;nj lemon law&quot;, they all are in there to some extent, but are so far down the list it&#039;s ridiculous.&#160; We did all the right things - kept page filenames the same, did 301 redirects for any pages that we did have to change and worked with an SEO firm to do all the right things and cleaned up a lot of little problems.&#160; Ask dropped us out of their rankings for just about everything right after the redesign.
  

To this day, you can go to ask.com and type in the term &quot;lemon law&quot; and not find our site in the results.&#160; We are considered, in our field, an expert in lemon law and have been for about 15 years.&#160; So what, now that our site is more professional looking, we get excluded?&#160; Our site has tons of information on lemon law and by their own description of their new algorithm, we should rank somewhere in there if only for the information contained on our site.
  

What&#039;s even worse (for us anyway) is that our biggest competitor just recently redesigned their website (to compete with us), again a complete overhaul and their site has not lost one spot in placement.&#160; Do they like them better than us?&#160; Do they feel their site is more informative than ours?&#160; It just doesn&#039;t make sense to me.&#160; By all rights, both of the sites should be up there.
  

I haven&#039;t found a good explanation for this yet and Ask does not want to provide any information whatsoever.&#160; They refer me to their webmaster guidelines, of course.&#160; There seems to be no good reason for this to happen.&#160; If anyone could explain it, it&#039;d be greatly appreciated.
  
  
  &#160;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a gripe with Ask concerning my company&#8217;s site (I never use the search engine personally).&nbsp; Last year we redesigned our website, a complete overhaul.&nbsp; Our site (lemonlaw.com) ranked #1 on Google, MSN and #2 on Yahoo for many terms we optimized for, but this example specifically sticks to the term &#8220;lemon law&#8221;.&nbsp; After the redesign, our rankings got even better overall.&nbsp; On Ask however, our site disappeared completely.&nbsp; Owning the domain &#8220;lemonlaw.com&#8221; alone should get us somewhere, but we don&#8217;t even show up on ask&#8217;s results for that term.&nbsp; How can that be?&nbsp; It makes absolutely no sense.&nbsp; All of the other terms, for example &#8211; specific state lemon laws, such &#8220;pa lemon law&#8221; and &#8220;nj lemon law&#8221;, they all are in there to some extent, but are so far down the list it&#8217;s ridiculous.&nbsp; We did all the right things &#8211; kept page filenames the same, did 301 redirects for any pages that we did have to change and worked with an SEO firm to do all the right things and cleaned up a lot of little problems.&nbsp; Ask dropped us out of their rankings for just about everything right after the redesign.</p>
<p>To this day, you can go to ask.com and type in the term &#8220;lemon law&#8221; and not find our site in the results.&nbsp; We are considered, in our field, an expert in lemon law and have been for about 15 years.&nbsp; So what, now that our site is more professional looking, we get excluded?&nbsp; Our site has tons of information on lemon law and by their own description of their new algorithm, we should rank somewhere in there if only for the information contained on our site.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even worse (for us anyway) is that our biggest competitor just recently redesigned their website (to compete with us), again a complete overhaul and their site has not lost one spot in placement.&nbsp; Do they like them better than us?&nbsp; Do they feel their site is more informative than ours?&nbsp; It just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.&nbsp; By all rights, both of the sites should be up there.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t found a good explanation for this yet and Ask does not want to provide any information whatsoever.&nbsp; They refer me to their webmaster guidelines, of course.&nbsp; There seems to be no good reason for this to happen.&nbsp; If anyone could explain it, it&#8217;d be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>  &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukesh</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-26716</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/ask-the-algorithm-sucks/#comment-26716</guid>
		<description>You said it, ASK sucks big time.. these stupid guys should hav invested money in building a better algo rather than on advertising a crappy service. Ask spiders are really lazy and never index new stuff on the web. They revolve around only a few bigshot websites and everything else in their database is damn old. They don&#039;t index new stuff as they cannot detect spam from non-spammy pages. As they rightly said in &#039;thealgorightm.com&#039; - their algo is blind as a bat.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it, ASK sucks big time.. these stupid guys should hav invested money in building a better algo rather than on advertising a crappy service. Ask spiders are really lazy and never index new stuff on the web. They revolve around only a few bigshot websites and everything else in their database is damn old. They don&#8217;t index new stuff as they cannot detect spam from non-spammy pages. As they rightly said in &#8216;thealgorightm.com&#8217; &#8211; their algo is blind as a bat.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 436/437 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: acf.neosmart.net

Served from: neosmart.net @ 2012-05-25 01:52:13 -->
