Comments on: Complete .NET Portability with Wine & Mono? http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/ Connecting Ideas Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:55:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mahmoud Al-Qudsi http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-94005 Mahmoud Al-Qudsi Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:23:20 +0000 http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/#comment-94005 "consider using the (technically-inferior, compatibility-superior) GTK#" Looks right to me... ReactOS is built on the Wine code (more or less, obvious or otherwise) and it's quite stable (relatively speaking, for an alpha OS) and doesn't seem to have any serious GDI deficiencies. http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/reactos-the-next-windows/ “consider using the (technically-inferior, compatibility-superior) GTK#”

Looks right to me…

ReactOS is built on the Wine code (more or less, obvious or otherwise) and it’s quite stable (relatively speaking, for an alpha OS) and doesn’t seem to have any serious GDI deficiencies.

http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/reactos-the-next-windows/

]]> By: supercheetah http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-93587 supercheetah Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:36:42 +0000 http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/#comment-93587 There's supposed to be a closing paren after "inefficiencies." There’s supposed to be a closing paren after “inefficiencies.”

]]> By: supercheetah http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/comment-page-1/#comment-93585 supercheetah Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:34:43 +0000 http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/complete-net-portability-with-wine-mono/#comment-93585 Actually, using Wine was not the easy way out (too much instability, and GDI+ inefficiencies, and was the reason they abandoned it. Actually, using Wine was not the easy way out (too much instability, and GDI+ inefficiencies, and was the reason they abandoned it.

]]>