<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why isn&#8217;t WPA2 an Automatic Update?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Klaus</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-446896</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-446896</guid>
		<description>CD-Man&#039;s link is invaluable. I can&#039;t get my legit install to properly validate because I don&#039;t have the latest version of IE and I&#039;m not going to install the latest WGA junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CD-Man&#8217;s link is invaluable. I can&#8217;t get my legit install to properly validate because I don&#8217;t have the latest version of IE and I&#8217;m not going to install the latest WGA junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cd-MaN</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-334867</link>
		<dc:creator>Cd-MaN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-334867</guid>
		<description>The direct link to the new update is: http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/b/5/ab58a702-eaed-4997-8027-c6bb61e6b503/WindowsXP-KB917021-v3-x86-ENU.exe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The direct link to the new update is: <a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/b/5/ab58a702-eaed-4997-8027-c6bb61e6b503/WindowsXP-KB917021-v3-x86-ENU.exe" rel="nofollow">http://download.microsoft.com/download/a/b/5/ab58a702-eaed-4997-8027-c6bb61e6b503/WindowsXP-KB917021-v3-x86-ENU.exe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blur - WEP, WPA, WPA2, and Windows XP</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-317273</link>
		<dc:creator>blur - WEP, WPA, WPA2, and Windows XP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-317273</guid>
		<description>[...] is Windows XP, not the router. Windows XP doesn&#8217;t natively support WPA2. A little quote from Neosmart: The only problem? Windows XP isn&#8217;t compatible with WPA2-secured networks without a special [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is Windows XP, not the router. Windows XP doesn&#8217;t natively support WPA2. A little quote from Neosmart: The only problem? Windows XP isn&#8217;t compatible with WPA2-secured networks without a special [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Miley</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Miley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145876</guid>
		<description>I fully agree, but the fact of the matter is that with WEP you can derive a key, where WPA needs to be brute forced.  If you have a strong password WPA is a thousand times better than WEP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree, but the fact of the matter is that with WEP you can derive a key, where WPA needs to be brute forced.  If you have a strong password WPA is a thousand times better than WEP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eip</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145385</link>
		<dc:creator>eip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145385</guid>
		<description>Jamie Miley, weak password is weak, anyway. Is WEP better than WPA in this case, really doesn&#039;t matter. Just have a strong password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie Miley, weak password is weak, anyway. Is WEP better than WPA in this case, really doesn&#8217;t matter. Just have a strong password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eip</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145384</link>
		<dc:creator>eip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-145384</guid>
		<description>Now they are having another update that supersedes KB893357. Here it is:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021
And yes, validation is required. 

I don&#039;t know what are the changes between this and KB893357.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now they are having another update that supersedes KB893357. Here it is:<br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917021</a><br />
And yes, validation is required. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what are the changes between this and KB893357.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Miley</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-108303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Miley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-108303</guid>
		<description>ok how do you figure wpa with a weak password is less secure than wep... i need to hear more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok how do you figure wpa with a weak password is less secure than wep&#8230; i need to hear more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matias</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-104340</link>
		<dc:creator>Matias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-104340</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is worried about security? Then why is it the most insecure OS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is worried about security? Then why is it the most insecure OS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Watch: Hacking with smart phones - CNET</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-33929</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Watch: Hacking with smart phones - CNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-33929</guid>
		<description>[...] Why isn&#8217;t WPA2 an Automatic Update? at The NeoSmart Files  If you&#8217;re using Wi-Fi in your workplace, chances are, you&#8217;re using WPA2 security. &#8230; in Hacking, Security, Software, Windows Tags: WEP, Wi-Fi, Wireless, WPA, WPA2 &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why isn&#8217;t WPA2 an Automatic Update? at The NeoSmart Files  If you&#8217;re using Wi-Fi in your workplace, chances are, you&#8217;re using WPA2 security. &#8230; in Hacking, Security, Software, Windows Tags: WEP, Wi-Fi, Wireless, WPA, WPA2 &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ασφαλίστε με νέα κρυπτογράφηση το ασύρματο δίκτυό σας. - TechTeam Community</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-25540</link>
		<dc:creator>Ασφαλίστε με νέα κρυπτογράφηση το ασύρματο δίκτυό σας. - TechTeam Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-25540</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] αγοράς.Επίσης, ακόμα δεν είναι διαθέσιμο για 64 μπιτα συστήματα ΧΡ.Το τελευταίο το είδα μόνο εδώ.Πηγή είδησης news.bbc.co.uk   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Last.fm (noisis) &#8211; Τελευταία τραγούδια 21/6, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-18283</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-18283</guid>
		<description> WPA2 is now suported with the installation of XP x64 SP2!!

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb294403.aspx

&#039;Bout time MS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPA2 is now suported with the installation of XP x64 SP2!!</p>
<p><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb294403.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb294403.aspx</a></p>
<p>&#8216;Bout time MS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-16548</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-16548</guid>
		<description>Lol, that&#039;s &quot;as of yet unanswered&quot; by Microsoft.

They just don&#039;t feel like it. They haven&#039;t given us an explanation, and we can&#039;t think of one for them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, that&#8217;s &#8220;as of yet unanswered&#8221; by Microsoft.</p>
<p>They just don&#8217;t feel like it. They haven&#8217;t given us an explanation, and we can&#8217;t think of one for them. <img src='http://neosmart.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoYo</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-16530</link>
		<dc:creator>YoYo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-16530</guid>
		<description>Wait so why wasn&#039;t it included as an automatic update, per the title of the article? I found this page via google and I&#039;m sure other searches are curious as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait so why wasn&#8217;t it included as an automatic update, per the title of the article? I found this page via google and I&#8217;m sure other searches are curious as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Live WiFi Center Almost Ready! at The NeoSmart Files</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-14373</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Live WiFi Center Almost Ready! at The NeoSmart Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-14373</guid>
		<description>[...] do have one tiny concern however: would it be too much to ask that the Live WiFi Center contain support for WPA2-encrypted networks? Now that would be something to look forward too!  Microsoft, Reviews, Software, WiFi Center, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do have one tiny concern however: would it be too much to ask that the Live WiFi Center contain support for WPA2-encrypted networks? Now that would be something to look forward too!  Microsoft, Reviews, Software, WiFi Center, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WIFI. Is WEP dead? Why is it offered? - CNET Viruses &#38; security alerts Forums</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-13740</link>
		<dc:creator>WIFI. Is WEP dead? Why is it offered? - CNET Viruses &#38; security alerts Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/#comment-13740</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] don&#039;t have x64 machine but I learned today that x64 XP system might have problem.http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/They (x64 users) need 3rd party instead.   Reply Permalink Report offensive post       Total posts: [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] don&#8217;t have x64 machine but I learned today that x64 XP system might have problem.http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/why-isnt-wpa2-an-automatic-update/They (x64 users) need 3rd party instead.   Reply Permalink Report offensive post       Total posts: [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
