<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2 Released!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: windows xp x64</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-157816</link>
		<dc:creator>windows xp x64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-157816</guid>
		<description>[...] x64 Edition SP2, ... You can slipstream SP2 into your windows XP x64 Edition CD by copying the ...http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/Windows XP Professional x64 Edition/Windows Server 2003 x64 EditionWindows Server/XP 64-Bit Extended [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] x64 Edition SP2, &#8230; You can slipstream SP2 into your windows XP x64 Edition CD by copying the &#8230;http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/Windows XP Professional x64 Edition/Windows Server 2003 x64 EditionWindows Server/XP 64-Bit Extended [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista SP1 Pre-Slipstreamed DVD Images Available &#x2014; The NeoSmart Files</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-106980</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista SP1 Pre-Slipstreamed DVD Images Available &#x2014; The NeoSmart Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-106980</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows Vista, the process of slipstreaming a service pack is no longer as simple as it once was as a result of the new WinPE/WIM based installation procedure. Since the installation media is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Vista, the process of slipstreaming a service pack is no longer as simple as it once was as a result of the new WinPE/WIM based installation procedure. Since the installation media is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuckin Futs</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72490</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuckin Futs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72490</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE:&lt;/strong&gt; "where did you get that x64 nLite info from?" XP x64 was issued Corporate CD with SP1 already added when I 1st recieved in '05. I forget where I got nLite from but it was a free link from a site with an article for slipstreaming XP Pro (x86 at the time). Ya, ut does look like I could do it in an x86 OS.

&#160;I just wanted to know why I had Num Lock enabled before an dnot now after SP2 integration as used from this here command prompt and another one as well?

If I do get nLite to work, how do I make sure Explorer 7, Media Player 11(will this overwrite MP 10?, Media Run Time&#160;Encoder 9.5 for x64, and Net Framework 3.0 (do I need to leave 2.0 in?). I need to leave the CD in Tact except for removing old messenger and add current one.

For my own 3 workstations, I do use and the Intel RAID on ICH9R so it can bennifit me to not have to do this&#160;via (f6)&#160;floppy anymore. Where do I need to use or put that iostar sis32 driver for Intel Matrix RAID?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE:</strong> &#8220;where did you get that x64 nLite info from?&#8221; XP x64 was issued Corporate CD with SP1 already added when I 1st recieved in &#8216;05. I forget where I got nLite from but it was a free link from a site with an article for slipstreaming XP Pro (x86 at the time). Ya, ut does look like I could do it in an x86 OS.</p>
<p>&nbsp;I just wanted to know why I had Num Lock enabled before an dnot now after SP2 integration as used from this here command prompt and another one as well?</p>
<p>If I do get nLite to work, how do I make sure Explorer 7, Media Player 11(will this overwrite MP 10?, Media Run Time&nbsp;Encoder 9.5 for x64, and Net Framework 3.0 (do I need to leave 2.0 in?). I need to leave the CD in Tact except for removing old messenger and add current one.</p>
<p>For my own 3 workstations, I do use and the Intel RAID on ICH9R so it can bennifit me to not have to do this&nbsp;via (f6)&nbsp;floppy anymore. Where do I need to use or put that iostar sis32 driver for Intel Matrix RAID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72487</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72487</guid>
		<description>No, there shouldn't be a problem with that...

Nuckin, where did you get that x64 nLite info from?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, there shouldn&#8217;t be a problem with that&#8230;</p>
<p>Nuckin, where did you get that x64 nLite info from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apokalipse</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72486</link>
		<dc:creator>Apokalipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72486</guid>
		<description>nlite does work when modifying XP x64 edition. I tried it myself.

Though, I did modify it (XP x64) while using XP 32-bit. Did you mean that you can't run nlite itself inside a 64-bit OS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nlite does work when modifying XP x64 edition. I tried it myself.</p>
<p>Though, I did modify it (XP x64) while using XP 32-bit. Did you mean that you can&#8217;t run nlite itself inside a 64-bit OS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72485</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72485</guid>
		<description>nLite can be used for both x86 and x64 copies of Windows, I think. The program itself is x86, but it's compatible with x64 versions of Windows, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nLite can be used for both x86 and x64 copies of Windows, I think. The program itself is x86, but it&#8217;s compatible with x64 versions of Windows, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuckin_Futs</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72482</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuckin_Futs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72482</guid>
		<description>Thankx, but I was told nKite was 32bit and am running in bothe Server and XP x64. Also, I know how to fix in regedit, but it only fixes as described above, enabled just after I enter a profile (tested when not using 10-key, to see that it does enable just as it's loading user settings.

Did something in SP2 change this for non 10-key or notebooks? Would slpi streaming a origional CD (w/ no SP1) work the same?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankx, but I was told nKite was 32bit and am running in bothe Server and XP x64. Also, I know how to fix in regedit, but it only fixes as described above, enabled just after I enter a profile (tested when not using 10-key, to see that it does enable just as it&#8217;s loading user settings.</p>
<p>Did something in SP2 change this for non 10-key or notebooks? Would slpi streaming a origional CD (w/ no SP1) work the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apokalipse</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72480</link>
		<dc:creator>Apokalipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72480</guid>
		<description>I believe nlite (a program to customise a Windows install CD) gives you the option to enable or disable numlock by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe nlite (a program to customise a Windows install CD) gives you the option to enable or disable numlock by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuckin Futs</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72478</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuckin Futs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72478</guid>
		<description>I did the slipstream as above. I did it to my XP x64 with SP1&#160; cause it's the only CD I ever had. It worked but now I don't get the Number lock on enabled as loading, not till I actually enter a user profile. However, our profiles consist largely of numbers and would like to have number lock on when loading to log in screan. This happened to "2" different SP2 slipstreams. Is this normal I have "2" XP x64 SP1 CD's one" ARMPXVOL_EN and other is&#160;XPMPXVOL_EN. Bothe came out withouth numberlock enabled at log in screan. How can I correct this for descktop systems with 12-key keyboards?

&#160;

Thankx in advance!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the slipstream as above. I did it to my XP x64 with SP1&nbsp; cause it&#8217;s the only CD I ever had. It worked but now I don&#8217;t get the Number lock on enabled as loading, not till I actually enter a user profile. However, our profiles consist largely of numbers and would like to have number lock on when loading to log in screan. This happened to &#8220;2&#8243; different SP2 slipstreams. Is this normal I have &#8220;2&#8243; XP x64 SP1 CD&#8217;s one&#8221; ARMPXVOL_EN and other is&nbsp;XPMPXVOL_EN. Bothe came out withouth numberlock enabled at log in screan. How can I correct this for descktop systems with 12-key keyboards?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Thankx in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shiv</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72470</link>
		<dc:creator>shiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-72470</guid>
		<description>pn-OD XPP01.021

XP Pro SP2

English

plz send serial number
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pn-OD XPP01.021</p>
<p>XP Pro SP2</p>
<p>English</p>
<p>plz send serial number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mummy</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-70245</link>
		<dc:creator>mummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-70245</guid>
		<description>first thx for this program

please i need the password of this win ( Service Pack 2 for Windows XP Professional, x64.

&#160;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first thx for this program</p>
<p>please i need the password of this win ( Service Pack 2 for Windows XP Professional, x64.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-49814</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-49814</guid>
		<description>Well, the folder-naming descrepancy is easily explained away:

i386 is a computer &lt;em&gt;architecture&lt;/em&gt;, used to refer to the current generation of x86-compatible processors.

Amd64 is the term used to describe the x64-capable computer architecture (now used by both AMD and Intel - the latter is called "EMT64" but is fully compatible).

So on an x64 installer, you'll have Amd64 instead of i386 and vice-versa.

As for c:\sp2.... I'm not sure of what exactly you typed in the command prompt, but I don't see a reason for that folder not to be there if you typed the same thing as last time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the folder-naming descrepancy is easily explained away:</p>
<p>i386 is a computer <em>architecture</em>, used to refer to the current generation of x86-compatible processors.</p>
<p>Amd64 is the term used to describe the x64-capable computer architecture (now used by both AMD and Intel - the latter is called &#8220;EMT64&#8243; but is fully compatible).</p>
<p>So on an x64 installer, you&#8217;ll have Amd64 instead of i386 and vice-versa.</p>
<p>As for c:\sp2&#8230;. I&#8217;m not sure of what exactly you typed in the command prompt, but I don&#8217;t see a reason for that folder not to be there if you typed the same thing as last time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuckin Futs</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-49709</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuckin Futs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-49709</guid>
		<description>I'm just curious myself. I did this back last yr but in a S2K3 x86 and it came out as described here with the i386 folders and I had to integrate it next. However this time I'm on my XP Pro x64 and it seamed to do it all in shot. Also, if I extracted the sp2.exe file the i386 is now a amd64 folder. It worked but was just curious why the folder difference and why it didnt leave the extracted folder to the C:\sp2 folder like last time. It showed as coping to c:cd something (to fast to read) and was done. I press OK and the xp CD folder is now bigger by a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just curious myself. I did this back last yr but in a S2K3 x86 and it came out as described here with the i386 folders and I had to integrate it next. However this time I&#8217;m on my XP Pro x64 and it seamed to do it all in shot. Also, if I extracted the sp2.exe file the i386 is now a amd64 folder. It worked but was just curious why the folder difference and why it didnt leave the extracted folder to the C:\sp2 folder like last time. It showed as coping to c:cd something (to fast to read) and was done. I press OK and the xp CD folder is now bigger by a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp2 x64 com files - jy5z3n528mlg.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-45903</link>
		<dc:creator>sp2 x64 com files - jy5z3n528mlg.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-45903</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] them both with your favorite compatible file archive util ( I used Uniextractor ). ...  Search Comments on: Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2 Released!By: x64 sp2 site file download - huntontheweb.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] them both with your favorite compatible file archive util ( I used Uniextractor ). &#8230;  Search Comments on: Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2 Released!By: x64 sp2 site file download - huntontheweb.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x64 sp2 site file download - huntontheweb.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-32476</link>
		<dc:creator>x64 sp2 site file download - huntontheweb.com - Full free download, serial, keygen, crack files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-xp-x64-service-pack-2-released/#comment-32476</guid>
		<description>[...] Service branch. Msi.dll, 3.1.4000.4042, 4491264, 23-Mar-2007, 12:35, x64, SP2 ... Search Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2 Released! at The NeoSmart FilesDownload the Windows2003 SP2 32bit version (WindowsServer2003-KB914961-SP2-x86-ENU) and the x64 SP2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Service branch. Msi.dll, 3.1.4000.4042, 4491264, 23-Mar-2007, 12:35, x64, SP2 &#8230; Search Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2 Released! at The NeoSmart FilesDownload the Windows2003 SP2 32bit version (WindowsServer2003-KB914961-SP2-x86-ENU) and the x64 SP2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
