<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Abandons Standards, Forks OpenID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/</link>
	<description>Connecting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Wisely</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-441192</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Wisely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-441192</guid>
		<description>That has much to do with the difficulty marketing their product as

WeOWNyoushutup 6.0


OpenID seems more pleasant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That has much to do with the difficulty marketing their product as</p>
<p>WeOWNyoushutup 6.0</p>
<p>OpenID seems more pleasant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaiulBaztepo</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-390057</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiulBaztepo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-390057</guid>
		<description>Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource! 
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#039;v just started to learn this language ;)
See you! 
Your, Raiul Baztepo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!<br />
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#8217;v just started to learn this language <img src='http://neosmart.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
See you!<br />
Your, Raiul Baztepo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody announces their use of OpenID&#8230; Nobody actually uses OpenID &#124; Morouxshi</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-359892</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody announces their use of OpenID&#8230; Nobody actually uses OpenID &#124; Morouxshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-359892</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo!, Microsoft and AOL are all officially supporting OpenID. Even Google announced they were using something similar and calling it OpenID. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo!, Microsoft and AOL are all officially supporting OpenID. Even Google announced they were using something similar and calling it OpenID. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron j</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-350619</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-350619</guid>
		<description>Um...your excerpts above from the Google blog describe OpenID 2.0 rather accurately.  What are you complaining about, exactly?  Have you read the spec yourself?  Discovery is indeed a departure from OpenID 1.0, a departure built into OpenID 2.0.

I&#039;m unable to draw the same conclusion as you when looking at the excerpts of Google&#039;s blog that you have included in your article.  Your interpretation doesn&#039;t seem to match up.  Google&#039;s own blog says &quot;The initial version of the API will use the OpenID 2.0 protocol to enable websites to validate the identity of a Google Account user&quot; -- this is as plain as it gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;your excerpts above from the Google blog describe OpenID 2.0 rather accurately.  What are you complaining about, exactly?  Have you read the spec yourself?  Discovery is indeed a departure from OpenID 1.0, a departure built into OpenID 2.0.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m unable to draw the same conclusion as you when looking at the excerpts of Google&#8217;s blog that you have included in your article.  Your interpretation doesn&#8217;t seem to match up.  Google&#8217;s own blog says &#8220;The initial version of the API will use the OpenID 2.0 protocol to enable websites to validate the identity of a Google Account user&#8221; &#8212; this is as plain as it gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemanth</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-349131</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-349131</guid>
		<description>I guess Google is not much interested in following standards other that their own. The certainly consider FriendsConnect as the future of cross platform user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Google is not much interested in following standards other that their own. The certainly consider FriendsConnect as the future of cross platform user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s non-evil pose: Hand out, palm facing up - Neil_Stevens&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-345560</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s non-evil pose: Hand out, palm facing up - Neil_Stevens&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-345560</guid>
		<description>[...] to be this great, free software-friendly company, but at every opportunity they pull the same embrace and extend tactics that Microsoft has perfected, on more than one occasion. It&#8217;s all about lock in with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be this great, free software-friendly company, but at every opportunity they pull the same embrace and extend tactics that Microsoft has perfected, on more than one occasion. It&#8217;s all about lock in with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Google Federated Login in your Rails Application</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-331865</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Google Federated Login in your Rails Application</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-331865</guid>
		<description>[...] login button). However, it turmed out that it wasn&#8217;t really OpenID, it was something that resembles of OpenID. Even thought it isn&#8217;t pure OpenID, it does everything I want anyway, so I started to code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] login button). However, it turmed out that it wasn&#8217;t really OpenID, it was something that resembles of OpenID. Even thought it isn&#8217;t pure OpenID, it does everything I want anyway, so I started to code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Everything Madison &#38; Sweden news &#171; Bridging the Open-Closed Divide</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-316307</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Everything Madison &#38; Sweden news &#171; Bridging the Open-Closed Divide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-316307</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conversation about FOSS in industry and whether Google is to be trusted with their Microsoft-like &#8220;embrace and extend&#8221; of OpenID.Â Photis always makes sure I don&#8217;t live in a FOSS bubble, which I suppose is a good thing.Â [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google en openid &#171; Twistedmind&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-316110</link>
		<dc:creator>Google en openid &#171; Twistedmind&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-316110</guid>
		<description>[...] nu de rook is weggetrokken: Google blijkt helemaal niet echt OpenId te ondersteunen, maar heeft een eigen standaard ontwikkeld. Microsoft daarentegen volgt wel de Openid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nu de rook is weggetrokken: Google blijkt helemaal niet echt OpenId te ondersteunen, maar heeft een eigen standaard ontwikkeld. Microsoft daarentegen volgt wel de Openid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Pune &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My take on OpenID</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-312453</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Pune &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My take on OpenID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-312453</guid>
		<description>[...] announced so called OpenID launch which scared me again about OpenIDI&#8217;m not totally against OpenID concept, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] announced so called OpenID launch which scared me again about OpenIDI&#8217;m not totally against OpenID concept, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Isaacs II</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-298343</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Isaacs II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-298343</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an explanation of why Google did what they did

http://oauthgoog.blogspot.com/2008/10/googles-openid-idp-is-now-live-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an explanation of why Google did what they did</p>
<p><a href="http://oauthgoog.blogspot.com/2008/10/googles-openid-idp-is-now-live-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://oauthgoog.blogspot.com/2008/10/googles-openid-idp-is-now-live-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveID now an OpenID provider &#171; The Tech Lunch</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-298181</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveID now an OpenID provider &#171; The Tech Lunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-298181</guid>
		<description>[...] main problem OpenID is facing is Google. They have an created a version of OpenID that is not completely compatible. If this will lead to a switch to the Google version or if it leaves Google behind, remains to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] main problem OpenID is facing is Google. They have an created a version of OpenID that is not completely compatible. If this will lead to a switch to the Google version or if it leaves Google behind, remains to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergiu Bagrin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 6 din Online</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-297038</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergiu Bagrin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 6 din Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-297038</guid>
		<description>[...] Google + OpenID = Fail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google + OpenID = Fail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEBclusive &#187; Blog &#187; Microsoft en Google ondersteunen OpenID</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-293610</link>
		<dc:creator>WEBclusive &#187; Blog &#187; Microsoft en Google ondersteunen OpenID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-293610</guid>
		<description>[...] een aantal critici die menen dat de implementatie van OpenID zoals Google het nu heeft gedaan niet aan de juiste standaarden voldoet. Voor de acceptatie van OpenID is het belangrijk dat alle providers OpenID op dezelfde manier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] een aantal critici die menen dat de implementatie van OpenID zoals Google het nu heeft gedaan niet aan de juiste standaarden voldoet. Voor de acceptatie van OpenID is het belangrijk dat alle providers OpenID op dezelfde manier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Clarifies Its OpenID Implementation &#124; android blog</title>
		<link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-293542</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Clarifies Its OpenID Implementation &#124; android blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/#comment-293542</guid>
		<description>[...] suggested that Google was not following the OpenID guidelines closely and that it was basically forking OpenID to suit its own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suggested that Google was not following the OpenID guidelines closely and that it was basically forking OpenID to suit its own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
