{"id":1003,"date":"2011-02-20T15:14:22","date_gmt":"2011-02-20T13:14:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/?p=1003"},"modified":"2011-02-21T11:46:14","modified_gmt":"2011-02-21T09:46:14","slug":"the-death-of-bcc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/the-death-of-bcc\/","title":{"rendered":"The Death of BCC?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the age of Facebook, in an era where privacy and anonymity are a thing of the very distant past, quite a few &#8220;features&#8221; of technology have been banished from daily use, forced to languish in the corner in a sad state of disuse and disrepair. But perhaps none have suffered such a miserable and regrettable fate as the BCC.<\/p>\n<p>Quick: if you&#8217;re fighting with a friend and want to let your BFF know what&#8217;s going on as you send your frenemy a nasty messsage \u2014 what&#8217;s the best way to pull that off?<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve completed the switch to Facebook mindset, your convoluted answer would consist of something to effect &#8220;Send a message to X, copy and paste it, and send it to Y.&#8221; And you&#8217;d be right &#8211; Facebook doesn&#8217;t give you another way of pulling this off. <strong>FAIL!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s say your technical skills are <em>not<\/em> in such a pitiful state and you have enough sense to still use email for day-to-day communications. What&#8217;s your answer then? &#8220;I&#8217;ll just send X an email, then forward my result to Y.&#8221; aaaaaaaaand that&#8217;s another fail.<\/p>\n<p>See, there&#8217;s this oft-overlooked feature my commandline mail client from the 80s has that solves this. It&#8217;s called &#8220;Blind Carbon Copy,&#8221; or BCC for short. You can send an email to more than one person without all your recipients knowing who you sent it to! <gasp><\/gasp><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, to use BCC it isn&#8217;t enough to just know about it and want to use it yourself &#8211; the people you&#8217;re BCCing in your emails need to have enough sense to look up at the &#8220;To:&#8221; line in their email client and find out what exactly is their role in this message. Are they the primary recipients of this email? Or perhaps they&#8217;re only officially in the loop, so that they can have a copy of this email for future reference and, if necessary, can step in when needed in the future? Or have they been BCC&#8217;d in the message &#8211; invisibly copied in on the contents of the email, because the sender wants them to see it without necessarily divulging this fact to the original recipient?<\/p>\n<p>But if people don&#8217;t look to see what status they&#8217;ve been delegated to in this email, then it just doesn&#8217;t work. And unfortunately, those of us that <em>do<\/em> use BCC no longer can. Imagine this email below:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>To: Margaret<\/p>\n<p>BCC: Jane<\/p>\n<p>Subject: The secret you told me about!<\/p>\n<p><br class=\"spacer_\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Dear Margaret,<\/p>\n<p>I just wanted to say thanks for confiding in me. I was really sorry to hear about ________, hopefully things will work out.<\/p>\n<p>Chin up!<\/p>\n<p>Carl<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Carl felt it would be OK to share this tidbit of info with Jane, his long time confidante. Margaret didn&#8217;t want anyone to know. Later that day, Jane sees Margaret at the supermarket, and before you know it:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Jane: Hey Margaret! How are you doing? Fancy seeing you here!<\/p>\n<p>Margaret: Oh, hi Jane!<\/p>\n<p>Jane: How&#8217;s the baby coming along?<\/p>\n<p>Margaret: CAAAAARL!!!!<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Yep. Because Carl hadn&#8217;t made it clear to Jane that <em>Margaret didn&#8217;t know she knew<\/em>, Jane figured everyone in the original conversation was &#8220;in on it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Given the unfortunately high percentage of people that fall into the same category as our Jane here, Carl just can&#8217;t use this technique any more. He simply can&#8217;t trust that Jane will have enough sense to realize she&#8217;s being invisibly BCC&#8217;d in the conversation, and has to result to this crude technique of letting her know:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>To: Jane<\/p>\n<p>Subject: FWD: The secret you told me about!<\/p>\n<p><br class=\"spacer_\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Hi Jane. This is a secret, Marge doesn&#8217;t know I told anyone! See you later!<\/p>\n<p>-Carl<\/p>\n<p><br class=\"spacer_\" \/><\/p>\n<p>To: Margaret<\/p>\n<p>Subject: The secret you told me about!<\/p>\n<p><br class=\"spacer_\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Dear Margaret,<\/p>\n<p>I just wanted to say thanks for confiding in me. I was really sorry to hear about ________, hopefully things will work out.<\/p>\n<p>Chin up!<\/p>\n<p>Carl<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m always shocked to find &#8220;techie friends&#8221; just don&#8217;t get BCC. To illustrate the point, one of my more well-versed friends in the arcane art of email called me up the other day: &#8220;I just wanted to double-check &#8211; if I have a list of 400 people I need to email at once but I don&#8217;t want them all to know each other&#8217;s emails&#8230;. It&#8217;s possible with BCC somehow, right? And how?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Shame, really. Rest in peace, BCC. You were a good friend and we had some great times together.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the age of Facebook, in an era where privacy and anonymity are a thing of the very distant past, quite a few &#8220;features&#8221; of technology have been banished from daily use, forced to languish in the corner in a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/the-death-of-bcc\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":505,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[767,197,150,320,17],"class_list":["post-1003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-software","tag-bcc","tag-communication","tag-email","tag-facebook","tag-privacy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4xDa-gb","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/505"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neosmart.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}