I only connected my LG through analogue when I was having trouble getting the ATi graphics installed on XP, because there was no VGA support through DVI, and as soon as I'd got that sorted I went straight back to DVI, without even bothering to customize the screen first.
Hence I have no basis for comparison between them as regards quality. I just assumed the more up-to-date interface would provide the best performance. (no conversion software/hardware needed between OS and screen)
I'm quite surprised you find the analogue appearance better. Is it perhaps that DVI is more crisp and shows the pixelation of the fonts more ? Is the analogue providing a font smoothing effect that you find more visually pleasing? What about a sharpness test pattern, how does that compare ?
Hence I have no basis for comparison between them as regards quality. I just assumed the more up-to-date interface would provide the best performance. (no conversion software/hardware needed between OS and screen)
I'm quite surprised you find the analogue appearance better. Is it perhaps that DVI is more crisp and shows the pixelation of the fonts more ? Is the analogue providing a font smoothing effect that you find more visually pleasing? What about a sharpness test pattern, how does that compare ?