This is your internet:
And this is your internet on drugs bandwidth meters:
This Is Your Internet On Bandwidth Meters
Reply
Tag Archives: net-neutrality
The (Biased) US Dept. of Justice…
The United States Department of Justice. Dedicated to enforcing the law and defend the interests of the United States. Especially when Corporate America is at stake. Why else would the DoJ not only allow a biased and wholly non-neutral, two-tier internet, but also encourage the creation of a status-based online status/priority queue.
We’re not going to waste any more breath (or keystrokes, they do run out you know!) on begging people to see otherwise but rather get right to the point and list the real reasons why a two-tier internet is a very bad thing.
Does Net-non-Neutrality Already Exist?
Net-Neutrality is without a doubt the biggest techno-political debate of the year. The entire issue has spun out of control since mid-2006, and here on the eve of 2007 it has yet to be resolved. The only question is, has net-neutrality already been destroyed and hacked-to-pieces to a greater extent than anyone thought already existed?
Earlier today, Slashdot featured a story on EarthLink’s “random” dropping of email messages. We just concluded a test of our own, and we find the results may not be as random as they seem. In fact, the results point directly to a big spider of sorts, sitting in the middle of all the tubes and picking what goes through and what doesn’t.
According to EarthLink themselves, “EarthLink’s mail system has been so overloaded that some users have been missing up to 90 percent of their incoming e-mail.” But what they don’t mention is, it isn’t random. As a matter of fact, our tests lead us to believe that EarthLink is indeed prioritizing not only message delivery time but also whether the messages ever get there or not.